A single-zone, time-limited pilot in which CORIOLIS ONE runs its allocation engine against your zone's actual stakeholder data and produces a written recommendation: with full reasoning: that you can compare against your current status-quo allocation.
No binding obligations. No public announcements without your permission. No disruption to your existing process. At the end of the pilot, you have a concrete, independently produced allocation recommendation you can evaluate on its own merits.
The engine takes four inputs per stakeholder in a given zone:
The engine runs a constrained optimisation across all stakeholders simultaneously, subject to three hard constraints: total allocation cannot exceed the sustainability ceiling; no party receives below a configurable treaty-floor minimum; no party's allocation moves more than a configurable maximum percentage in a single cycle (preventing destabilising step-changes).
The output is an allocation recommendation per stakeholder, with an explicit per-line explanation for each: not just a number, but a sentence of reasoning per allocation. All algorithm weights are inspectable. The engine has no stake in any outcome.
See it running right now: the same engine runs live across all six domains: fisheries, freshwater, carbon, forests, mining, and orbital spectrum. Each domain page uses real published baselines for that resource: FAO/SPRFMO stock assessments for fisheries, USGS/Global Water Watch data for freshwater, mapped mine-site data for mining, and so on. Adjust any parameter in real time and watch the allocation and reasoning update live.
Reference template: Pilot / Trial Agreement: a short, plain-English scoping document covering data handling, confidentiality, and the non-binding nature of the output. Available on request; we can also work within your organisation's standard NDA if preferred.
Cost for the evaluation pilot: no charge. We are at the proof-of-concept stage and the value of a validated real-world run outweighs any fee we could reasonably charge at this point. If a paid engagement follows the pilot, that is a separate conversation with no obligation.
If your organisation's procurement process requires a formal contract even for a no-cost engagement, the pilot agreement covers the essentials and is deliberately short (under four pages).
Same coordination-failure shape shows up everywhere: 3B+ people face freshwater scarcity across 263 transboundary river basins; 5,000+ satellites are already competing for low Earth orbit with Kessler-cascade risk rising; the Amazon is approaching a 20 to 25% deforestation tipping point; critical minerals demand is set to grow 55 to 80% by 2030 (IEA) with no neutral body weighing extraction against reserve depletion.
Every one of these six domains has the same structural problem: a scientifically defensible sustainable ceiling exists, several parties have a legitimate claim on the pool, and negotiated outcomes routinely land above that ceiling anyway, because no party wants to be the one that takes the cut and there is no neutral referee in the room. Bodies with strong scientific mandates: ICES, SPRFMO, CCAMLR, national environment agencies, river basin commissions: produce assessments that then get modified in the political negotiation round.
CORIOLIS ONE does not replace any of these processes. It produces the same kind of output a technical advisory body would: an independently calculated recommendation with documented reasoning: that feeds into the existing process rather than bypassing it. The analogy is Global Fishing Watch for fisheries monitoring: a tool that RFMOs and governments actually adopt because it augments their capabilities, not a tool that claims authority it does not have. The same model applies whichever of the six domains you work in.
The pilot is designed for organisations that have direct involvement in allocation or advisory functions for at least one contested zone in any of the six domains, have some level of existing data on stakeholder claims and compliance history, and are willing to share that data under NDA for a 30-day engagement.
This includes: RFMOs and fisheries ministries (WCPFC, CCAMLR, NEAFC, SEAFO, etc.); river basin authorities and water commissions; carbon registries and emissions trading bodies; mining and critical-minerals regulators; spectrum and orbital coordination bodies; conservation NGOs with a relevant mandate (WWF, Oceana, MSC, MAAP); and academic institutions running allocation or policy research in any of these six areas.
The conversation usually takes about 20 minutes: confirm the zone, confirm data availability, agree NDA terms. We can have a recommendation to you within 30 days of data receipt.
Start the Conversation See Live Demo First